A Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Flow and Settling in Sedimentation Tanks

Abstract

Sedimentation is perhaps the oldest and most common water treatment process. The principle of allowing turbid water to settle before it is drunk can be traced back to ancient times. In modern times a proper understanding of sedimentation tank behavior is essential for proper tank design and operation. Generally, sedimentation tanks are characterized by interesting hydrodynamic phenomena, such as density waterfalls, bottom currents and surface return currents, and are also sensitive to temperature fluctuations and wind effects. On the surface, a sedimentation tank appears to be a simple phase separating device, but down under an intricate balance of forces is present. Many factors clearly affect the capacity and performance of a sedimentation tank: surface and solids loading rates, tank type, solids removal mechanism, inlet design, weir placement and loading rate etc. To account for them, present-day designs are typically oversizing the settling tanks. In that way, designers hope to cope with the poor design that is responsible for undesired and unpredictable system disturbances, which may be of hydraulic, biological or physicochemical origin. To improve the design of process equipment while avoiding tedious and time consuming experiments Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) calculations have been employed during the last decades. Fluid flow patterns inside process equipment may be predicted by solving the partial differential equations that describe the conservation of mass and momentum. The geometry of sedimentation tanks makes analytical solutions of these equations impossible, so usually numerical solutions are implemented using Computational Fluid Dynamics packages. The advent of fast computers has improved the accessibility of CFD, which appears as an effective tool with great potential. Regarding sedimentation tanks, CFD may be used first for optimizing the design and retrofitting to improve effluent quality and underflow solids concentration. Second, it may increase the basic understanding of internal processes and their interactions. This knowledge can again be used for process optimization. The latter concerns the cost-effectiveness of a validated CFD model where simulation results can be seen as numerical experiments and partly replace expensive field experiments (Huggins et al. 2005).