Abstract

Battery electric modeling is a central aspect to improve the battery development process as well as to monitor battery system behavior. Besides conventional physical models, machine learning methods show great potential to learn this task using in-vehicle data. However, the performance of data-driven approaches differs significantly depending on their application and utilized data set. Hence, a comparison among these methods is required beforehand to select the optimal candidate for a given task.In this work, we address this problem and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a wide range of possible machine learning approaches for battery electric modeling. In a comprehensive study, various conventional regression methods and neural networks are analyzed. Each method is trained and optimized based on a large and qualitative data set of automotive driving profiles. In order to account for the influence of time-dependent battery processes, both low pass filters and sliding window approaches are investigated.As a result, neural networks are found to be superior compared to conventional regression methods in terms of accuracy and model complexity. In particular, Feedforward and Convolutional Neural Networks provide the smallest average error deviations of around 0.16%, which corresponds to an RMSE of 5.57mV on battery cell level. With automotive time series data as focus, neural networks additionally benefit from their ability to learn continuously. This key capability keeps the battery models updated at low computational costs and accounts for changing electrical behavior as the battery ages during operation.

Highlights

  • To reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and to enhance the air quality in densely populated regions, more and more automotive manufacturers are switching to electrifying their fleets

  • In order to pay more attention to the non-linearity, the kernel Support Vector Regression (SVR) is taken into account, which is used for state of health (SOH) estimation out of a virtual battery model in Klass (2015)

  • In SVR, important hyperparameters are the width of the -insensitive zone, and C, which is a trade-off parameter between the two optimization goals in SVR: a flat model function on the one side and as few deviations as possible from the -tube on the other side (Smola and Schölkopf 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To reduce global greenhouse gas emissions and to enhance the air quality in densely populated regions, more and more automotive manufacturers are switching to electrifying their fleets. In order to transform the automotive sector economically and successfully, the cost of battery cell manufacturing and analytics must be drastically reduced. A significant cost driver in the acceleration of the EV development process is the modeling of battery cells. The idea behind modeling is the creation of a digital twin of the battery. The digital twin can in turn be used to perform analyses in simulations without having to investigate real battery cells. This step saves both manufacturing capacities and, more importantly, the very limited test facilities

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call