Abstract
Modeling of ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has lagged that of other soil erosion processes despite its major contribution to watershed sediment losses. Several process and semi-empirical based simulation models have been used to assess the occurrence and location of EGs, magnitude of soil losses from EGs, and degradation, aggradation, and transport of sediment through EGs, but no comprehensive EG model exists. This paper reviews these models and presents a thorough discussion of their background, general formulations, key equations, field assessments, assumptions and limitations. Most current EG models evolved from the original formulations used in CREAMS, with incremental improvements by EGEM, WEPP, AnnAGNPS-REGEM, RUSLER-EphGEE models. These models provide process-based estimation of EG processes and field-scale soil-erosion contributions, but all models, except EphGEE, require users to have a priori knowledge of EG locations and all have significant shortcomings. Several topographic index models are discussed that provide simplistic approaches to locate EGs on the landscape using only topographic features. Process-based threshold index models may provide a more robust simulation of EG location and length, though testing has been limited. EG modeling appears to still be in its infancy, with great opportunities for future research, as discussed herein, to improve the understanding and simulation of EG erosion and transport processes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
