Three decades of ephemeral gully erosion studies

Abstract

Although concern for ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has been growing within the research community, knowledge gaps still need to be identified for a state-of-the-art review. This review is based on an extensive search of published literature in the Web of Science database that specifically addressed EG erosion. This review included 173 papers published in 56 scientific journals over the last 30 years. The results indicated that the main EG erosion topics were related to gully erosion processes, factors, methodology, models, and the detrimental effects of EGs. The definition of EG was identical worldwide. There is an urgency to define critical morphological values under different conditions for identifying EG channel locations in fields in order to map and model their development quickly and accurately. Topographic factors have been much more studied than other contributing factors, including climate, land management, soil, and hydraulics. Fifteen different methodological approaches or technologies, which were categorized into four kinds of methods, including field monitoring, modelling, simulation experiments, and review, have been employed to assess and quantify EG erosion. The average soil erosion rate of EGs in 36 publications increased and decreased with increase of slope and catchment areas, respectively, and the number of EGs linearly increased with catchment area. The complexity of the development of EG channels and the driving force mechanisms should also be studied intentionally, e.g., the quantification of soil detachment and sediment transport mechanisms for both surface and subsurface flow during different sub-processes, including gully head advance, sidewall collapse and bed incision. It was concluded that the interactive effects of different contributing factors on EG erosion across various spatio-temporal scales should be further researched. The comprehensive utilization or application of new methods and technologies, e.g., automatic monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence, machine learning algorithms, would be helpful to improve study efficiency and accuracy. The scientific basis of prediction models still needs further development and refinement. This review provides recommendations and suggestions to improve knowledge, prediction, and control of EG erosion.