Abstract

Machine learning (ML) algorithms are widely used to develop predictive frameworks. Accurate prediction of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) age of onset (ADAOO) is crucial to investigate potential treatments, follow-up, and therapeutic interventions. Although genetic and non-genetic factors affecting ADAOO were elucidated by other research groups and ours, the comprehensive and sequential application of ML to provide an exact estimation of the actual ADAOO, instead of a high-confidence-interval ADAOO that may fall, remains to be explored. Here, we assessed the performance of ML algorithms for predicting ADAOO using two AD cohorts with early-onset familial AD and with late-onset sporadic AD, combining genetic and demographic variables. Performance of ML algorithms was assessed using the root mean squared error (RMSE), the R-squared (R2), and the mean absolute error (MAE) with a 10-fold cross-validation procedure. For predicting ADAOO in familial AD, boosting-based ML algorithms performed the best. In the sporadic cohort, boosting-based ML algorithms performed best in the training data set, while regularization methods best performed for unseen data. ML algorithms represent a feasible alternative to accurately predict ADAOO with little human intervention. Future studies may include predicting the speed of cognitive decline in our cohorts using ML.

Highlights

  • Alzheimer’s disease (AD; OMIM 104300) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of neurological, mental, and cognitive functions, including memory, changes in judgment, behavior, and emotions [1,2,3,4]

  • AD is divided into familial AD (f AD), which accounts for 90% of AD cases

  • We previously studied the association of common exonic functional variants (CEFVs) with ADAOO (Table 1) [35,36] using single- and multi-locus linear mixed-effects models [77] and recursive partitioning Machine learning (ML) algorithms [36]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD; OMIM 104300) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of neurological, mental, and cognitive functions, including memory, changes in judgment, behavior, and emotions [1,2,3,4]. Other ML alternatives include the use of artificial intelligence (AI), namely deep learning (DL), assessing AD diagnosis and progression with brain radiological images [69,70] These results are promising, their main limitation is that the predictive model provided either an estimate of the risk of an individual for developing AD or the range within which the ADAOO may fall with high confidence (i.e., early- or late-onset based on whether the ADAOO was before or after a threshold, respectively), but not an estimate of the actual ADAOO. Our results suggest that ML constitutes a feasible and easy-to-implement new methodology to predict ADAOO, especially in the clinical setting, while significantly overpowering our previous results and paving the way for new possibilities to define follow-up and counseling strategies for patients and their family members

Materials and Methods
Variants Associated with ADAOO
ADAOO Prediction Using ML
ADAOO Prediction in the fAD E280A Pedigree
Variable Importance
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call