Abstract
Background: A good fracture classification should provide information about fracture stability and fracture mechanism, and should be a guide for treatment selection with a high degree of reproducibility. The purpose of this study was to analyze the degree of reliability of the two most widely used classification systems for pediatric ankle fractures: The AO classification and the Dias-Tachdjian Classification. Methods: We studied 53 patients, 34 male and 19 female, with ankle fractures. Two classifications, the AO classification and the Dias-Tachdjian classification, were used. Two groups of assessors, one consisting of experienced surgeons and the other of fellows, were asked to classify the fractures. The Cohen Kappa index was used to measure interobserver reliability and to determine interobserver agreement, the Kappa value was deduced using the Fleiss method. Interobserver agreement was measured using the Fleiss kappa coefficient, and intraobserver reliability was measured using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results: The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was not significantly different between the different groups of assessors. Conclusions: In the pediatric age different types of fractures and different mechanisms within an isolated fracture can be found. We found that many of these fracture patterns do not fit in any of the two classifications, which are thus unproductive for surgical planning.
Highlights
An ideal classification for fractures should provide information on fracture stability, fracture mechanism and, most important, should be a guide for treatment selection with a high degree of reproducibility.The Dias-Tachdjian classification is a modified version of the Lauge-Hansen ankle fracture classification for adults
The purpose of this study was to analyze the degree of reliability of the two most widely used classification systems for pediatric ankle fractures: The AO classification and the Dias-Tachdjian Classification
The Dias-Tachdjian classification has five subtypes based on fracture mechanism: Type I, type II, type III, type IV and type V (Figure 1) The fractures known as transitional fractures are common in adolescents close to the time of skeletal maturity, when the closure of the distal tibial physis has begun
Summary
An ideal classification for fractures should provide information on fracture stability, fracture mechanism and, most important, should be a guide for treatment selection with a high degree of reproducibility. The Dias-Tachdjian classification is a modified version of the Lauge-Hansen ankle fracture classification for adults. It evaluates the mechanism of injury and the foot position at the moment of trauma. A good fracture classification should provide information about fracture stability and fracture mechanism, and should be a guide for treatment selection with a high degree of reproducibility. The purpose of this study was to analyze the degree of reliability of the two most widely used classification systems for pediatric ankle fractures: The AO classification and the Dias-Tachdjian Classification. The reliability of the two most commonly used classifications has been poorly evaluated in studies [2]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Clinical & Experimental Orthopaedics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
