Abstract

This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear17 (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km). Energy expenditure and substrate utilisation were measured by a standardised 36 h calorimetry protocol; body composition was determined using air displacement plethysmography. Energy balance calculation were used to assess the physical challenge. There was difference in the daily energy expenditure (IM: 4,939 kcal day−1; SP-17: 6,461 kcal day−1, p = 0.004); differences related to physical activity were small, but statistically significant (IM = 2,282 kcal day−1; SP-17 = 3,174 kcal day−1; p = 0.004). Bodyweight loss was modest (IM = 7.8%, SP-17 = 6.5%; p > 0.05) as was fat loss (IM = 30.4%, SP-17 = 40.4%; p > 0.05). Lean tissue weight change was statistically significant (IM = − 2.5%, SP-17 = + 1.0%; p = 0.05). No difference was found in resting or sleeping energy expenditure, normalised to lean tissue weight (p > 0.05); nor in energy expenditure when exercising at 80, 100 and 120 steps min−1, normalised to body weight (p > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the change in normalised substrate utilisation for any of the activities (p > 0.05). Analysis suggested that higher daily energy expenditures for the men in Spear-17 was the result of higher physical demands resulting in a reduced demand for energy to thermoregulate compared to the women in Ice Maiden. The lack of differences between men and women in the change in energy expenditure and substrate utilisation, suggests no sex difference in response to exposure to extreme environments.

Highlights

  • This study investigates differences in pre- to post-expedition energy expenditure, substrate utilisation and body composition, between the all-male Spear[17] (SP-17) and all-female Ice Maiden (IM) transantarctic expeditions (IM: N = 6, 61 days, 1700 km; SP-17: N = 5, 67 days, 1750 km)

  • In a recent analysis of energy expenditure and substrate utilisation on an all-male transantarctic expedition (Spear-17), we found that this 60% increase in basal metabolic rate (BMR) was consistent with an increase in the energy required for t­hermoregulation[17]

  • We have previously reported a detailed analysis of the energy expenditure and substrate utilisation from participants in the Ice M­ aiden[18] and Spear-1717 expeditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A non-expedition study containing both male and female participants which modelled the components of the metabolic rate showed that the increase in BMR required for thermoregulation in high ambient temperatures was less than that required in low ­temperatures[7] These data were not partitioned on sex and it is not possible to determine whether the changes were the same for male and female participants. From earlier expeditionary studies the measured energy expenditure was found to be much higher than that predicted from activity s­ cores[14] and a 60% increase was found in the B­ MR15 which was attributed to increased thyroid activity This increase in BMR is consistent with small levels of weight loss seen in men undertaking low levels of physical work whilst over-wintering in A­ ntarctica[16]. The impact of HPG axis suppression on energy expenditure is unknown

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call