A Comparison of Pumping and Slug Tests for Estimating the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unweathered Wisconsian Age Till in Iowa

Abstract

AbstractThe low conductivity of glacial till is usually thought to preclude pumping tests, which has led to the predominate use of laboratory permeameter and single well response (slug) tests for estimating hydraulic conductivity. Slug tests only sample a small region around the well and may be more representative of the disturbance of well installation or development than in situ conductivity. To provide a larger scale comparison to slug test estimates of hydraulic conductivity for unweathered Wisconsin age till in Iowa, a pumping test was performed, with both the pumping and monitoring wells placed in unweathered till. Maintaining a constant drawdown of 439 cm in the pumping well for over five days yielded an average flowrate of only 26.3 ml/min, but produced a maximum drawdown of 104 cm at a radial distance of 178 cm. Assuming radial and vertical flow, least‐squares parameter estimation yielded a hydraulic conductivity estimate of 7.5 · 10‐7 cm/s and a specific storage estimate of 6.6 · 10‐6 cm‐1. Slug test results compared favorably, with geometric mean hydraulic conductivity estimates of 4.9 · 10‐7 cm/s from a Cooper et al. (1967) analysis and 7.1 · 10‐7 cm/s from a Hvorslev (1951) analysis. For this relatively low clay till (20% clay fraction), borehole smearing does not appear to have a significant impact on slug tests. The results indicate pumping tests can be performed, on an appropriate scale, in some unweathered tills.