Abstract

The present work compares the cooling performances of two different multiple orifice spray cooling strategies driven by a compact R-134a vapour compression loop equipped with a small-scale oil-free linear compressor. The strategies – an array of parallel sprays that impinge at a 90° with the heated surface and an array of oblique jets that collide against each other to form an impinging spray cone – are compared in terms of the number of orifices in the array, nozzle-to-surface distance, inter-nozzle distance, thermal load and temperature of the heat rejection medium. The comparisons are made for equivalent orifice flow restrictions and the same mass flow rate of 1.36 g/s at the lowest thermal load. For a hot end temperature of 25 °C, a maximum average heat transfer coefficient of 29.0 kW/m 2 K was achieved with a 5-parallel spray configuration with a 9.84-mm nozzle-to-surface distance. The maximum heat flux sustained by the system, 41.6 W/cm 2 , was achieved with a 3-colliding jet scheme with a nozzle-to-surface distance of 23.84 mm. To shed some light on the underlying heat transfer mechanisms, images extracted from high-speed video are used to show the interaction between the droplets, the liquid film and the heated surface. The refrigeration system performance parameters, such as the coefficient of performance and the compressor electrical power consumption are mildly affected by the spray characteristics. • Different spray schemes are compared in the same compact vapour compression system. • Spray interaction and liquid film evaporation is evaluated via high-speed imaging. • Comparison is based on heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and critical heat flux (CHF). • The 9.84-mm high, 5-parallel jet scheme presented the highest HTC (29 kW/m 2 K). • The 23.84-mm high, 3-colliding jet scheme presented the highest CHF (41.6 W/cm 2 ).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.