Abstract
This inquiry had 2 components: (1) the first was substantive and focused on the comparability of paper-based and computer-based test forms and (2) the second was a within-study comparison wherein a quasi-experimental method, propensity score matching, was compared with a credible benchmark method, a within-subjects design. The tests used in the comparison of online tests and paper-based tests were End-of-Course tests in Algebra and English, in a statewide high school testing program. Students were tested in Grades 8 and 9. In general, the substantive studies suggested that the online and paper tests appeared to be measuring the same underlying constructs with the same level of reliability. The within-study portion of the investigation indicated that propensity score matching study yielded results that were virtually identical to the outcome of the more conventional within-subjects experimental design. Both the methodological and substantive aspects of this investigation yielded outcomes that should be of interest to investigators in both of these areas.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call