A comparison of ovarian cancer mortality in women with BRCA1 mutations undergoing annual ultrasound screening or preventive oophorectomy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the survival experience of women with a BRCA1 mutation who enrolled in an ovarian cancer screening program with that of women who opted for preventive oophorectomy. MethodsWe followed 1964 women with a BRCA1 mutation and two ovaries intact in a prospective study. No women had ovarian cancer or had a bilateral oophorectomy prior to study initiation. There were 1814 women in the cohort who had at least one screening ultrasound. They were followed from the date of first ultrasound until the date of preventive oophorectomy, death or last follow-up. There were 659 women in the cohort who had preventive oophorectomy. They were followed from the date of preventive oophorectomy until death or last follow-up. ResultsAmong the 1196 women who had one or more ultrasound examinations and no oophorectomy, there were 73 incident cancers detected and 27 deaths from ovarian/fallopian cancer. The ten year cumulative risk of death was 2.0%. Among the 659 women who had a preventive oophorectomy there were 12 incident cancers (9 detected at oophorectomy and 3 in the follow up period) and two deaths from ovarian cancer. The ten year cumulative risk of death was 0.5%. The hazard ratio for oophorectomy versus ultrasound was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.97; p = 0.05). ConclusionThe survival of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer enrolled in an ultrasound screening program is relatively poor and screening is not a viable alternative to preventive oophorectomy.