A Comparison Between Three Computer-Based Cone Specific Color Vision Tests.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Computerized color contrast sensitivity (CS) tests that aim to determine presence, type, and severity of color vision deficiency have been developed and are available, but data on agreement between tests is lacking. The purpose of the present study was to determine data agreement between three computerized color vision tests.METHODS: A total of 50 subjects, 25 color vision normal (CVN) and 25 color vision deficient (CVD), were tested with the Konan CCT-HD®, NCI, and a modified version of the Innova CCT. Sensitivity and specificity were compared across systems as well as differences in log CS values and how these relate to standards used to classify occupational performance.RESULTS: Each test showed 100% sensitivity for detection of hereditary red-green CVDs as well as type (protan vs. deutan). Each test showed 100% specificity for confirming normal red-green color vision in CVNs. Innova CCT and NCI showed 100% specificity in CVNs and CVDs for S cone CS. Konan CCT-HD® showed 96% specificity in CVNs and 92% in CVDs for S cone CS.DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that each test reliably identifies hereditary CVD and confirms normal color vision. However, the three tests differ slightly in log CS values used to determine pass/fail scores of red-green color vision using a 100-point scale, and all show that protans consistently score lower than deutans on cone CS. Hence, depending on the criterion used in occupational settings, a single score may not prove equitable for individuals who have a protan deficiency.Lovell J, Rabin J. A comparison between three computer-based cone specific color vision tests. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(2):54-58.