Abstract
Over the last few years, many multimedia conferencing and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications have been developed due to the use of signaling protocols in providing video, audio and text chatting services between at least two participants. This paper compares between two widely common signaling protocols: InterAsterisk eXchange Protocol (IAX) and the extension of the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (Jingle) in terms of delay time during call setup, call teardown, and media sessions.
Highlights
A Comparison Between Inter-Asterisk eXchange Protocol and Jingle ProtocolAbstract—Over the last few years, many multimedia conferencing and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications have been developed due to the use of signaling protocols in providing video, audio and text chatting services between at least two participants
With the appearance of numerous multimedia conferencing and Voice over Internet protocols [3, 6, 10, 12], the decision to choose the appropriate protocol to be utilized in such a service has become very difficult since each protocol has its own privileges which differ from the corresponding privileges of the other protocols
The objective of this paper is mainly to make a comparative study between InterAsterisk eXchange Protocol (IAX) and Jingle protocols in terms of quality of services
Summary
Abstract—Over the last few years, many multimedia conferencing and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications have been developed due to the use of signaling protocols in providing video, audio and text chatting services between at least two participants. This paper compares between two widely common signaling protocols: InterAsterisk eXchange Protocol (IAX) and the extension of the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (Jingle) in terms of delay time during call setup, call teardown, and media sessions
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have