Abstract
The wear resistance of quenched-and-partitioned steel (Q&P) compared to martensite steel (Q&T) remains unclear. In this research, the wear resistance of Q&P steel and Q&T steel was researched by the means of the abrasive wear (AW) and impact abrasive wear (IAW) tests. The results show that abrasive ploughing was the main reason causing the material loss of Q&P and Q&T steel, while Q&T steel was subjected to severe fatigue spalling in the impact abrasive wear tests. Under the abrasive wear test, Q&T steel has better wear resistance due to its higher initial hardness. Under the impact abrasive wear test, Q&P steel has better wear resistance. This is because the formation of the deformed layer, which consists of finer grains and newly formed martensite in the worn subsurface, increased the hardness of the Q&P steel, causing the hardness of the worn subsurface in Q&P steel to be higher than that of Q&T steel. Furthermore, Q&P steel has better resistance to cracks nucleation and propagation compared to Q&T steel. As a result, less material loss was caused by fatigue spalling in Q&P steel under the impact abrasive wear tests.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
