Abstract
AbstractThe paper presents a comparative study of the finite element method (FEM) and the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) for the numerical evaluation of the volume‐averaged stress of composites. Two‐dimensional meso‐scale models of concrete represented by digital images and discretized using an automatic mesh generation algorithm are considered. The different computational approaches are discussed and compared with respect to accuracy and efficiency for both scenarios.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
