A Comparative Study of Mucosal Wound Healing after Excision with a Scalpel, Diode Laser, or CO2 Laser.

Abstract

Forty-five Sprague Dawley rats were used in this study. These rats were divided into two laser intervention groups (CO2, n = 15; diode, n = 15) and one control group with scalpel excision (n = 15). The effectiveness of therapy has been assessed based on the comparison of intraoperative, postoperative, and histological parameters on days 7, 21, and 35, and postoperative weight changes as pain indicator. Both laser groups demonstrated significantly (P < 0.05) less bleeding than did the control group during the intraoperative stage, whereas the CO2 laser showed more precise cutting compared with the diode laser (P < 0.05). The highest healing score was reported in the CO2 and scalpel groups on the first week of healing than in the diode group (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups on days 21 and 35. Weight loss was significantly (P < 0.05) demonstrated in the diode group compared to the scalpel and CO2 groups till day 7. Both laser groups demonstrated delayed healing process compared with the scalpel. Nevertheless, the CO2 group followed the scalpel trends after day 7. Scalpel and CO2 laser yielded a superior clinical outcome compared with the diode excision of oral mucosa, whereby the CO2 has been proposed as the most effective laser type at the end of the first postoperative month.