Abstract

Purpose:The feasibility of machine learning (ML) techniques and their performance compared to the conventional χ2-minimization technique in the context of the proton energy-resolved dose imaging method are presented. Materials and method:Various geometries resembling a wedge and varying gradients are simulated in GATE to obtain energy-resolved dose functions (ERDF) from proton beams of different energies. These ERDFs are used to predict the WEPL using a conventional technique and other ML-based methods. The results are compared to gain an understanding of the performance of ML models in proton radiography. Results:The results obtained from the χ2-minimization technique indicate that it is robust and more reliable compared to the ML-based techniques. It is also observed that the ML-based techniques did not mitigate the effect of range-mixing but seem to be more affected by it compared to the χ2-minimization technique. Substantial data reduction was required in order to make the results of ML-based methods comparable to that of χ2-minimization. We also note that such data reduction might not be possible in a clinical setting. The only advantage in using the ML-based technique is the computational time required to generate a WEPL map which, in our case study, is 10-30 times shorter than the time required for the conventional χ2-minimization technique. Conclusions:The first results from this preliminary study indicate that the ML techniques failed to be on par with the conventional χ2-minimization technique in terms of the achievable accuracy in the predictions of WEPL and in the mitigation of range-mixing effects in the WEPL image. Modern strategies like the GAN-based models may be suitable for such applications.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.