A comparative study of functional and radiological outcome on aperture versus suspensory femoral fixation in Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction

Objective To study the influence of various tunnel parameters and graft inclination angle (GIA) on the clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at long-term follow-up. Methods In this retrospective study, 80 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treated by single bundle ACLR using bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) and hamstring (HT) autografts were evaluated clinically and radiologically at their long-term follow-up. The study population were divided into two groups based on ideal and nonideal tunnel parameters as well as ideal and nonideal GIA. The various tunnel parameters and GIA were interpreted with clinical and radiological outcome at long-term follow-up. Results Eighty patients, 36 (45%) using BPTB and 44 (55%) using HT autografts, were available to complete the study. Patients with ideal coronal tibial tunnel angle (CTTA) and coronal femoral tunnel angle (CFTA) show superior clinical outcome (pivot shift test) than nonideal CTTA and CFTA, which was found to be statistically significant ( p -value < 0.038 and 0.024, respectively). Similarly, patients with ideal coronal tibial tunnel position (CTTP) show superior clinical outcome (International Knee Documentation Committee - IKDC objective) over nonideal CTTP ( p -value < 0.017). All other tunnel parameters and GIA were not found to have influence on clinical outcome. None of the tunnel parameters have influenced osteoarthritis (OA) change. There was no progression of OA change in the study population at long-term follow-up after ACLR. Conclusion Ideal coronal tunnel parameters produced a better clinical outcome at long-term follow-up after ACLR. There was no progression of OA change at long-term follow-up after isolated ACLR.

CSM 2014 Sports Physical Therapy Section Platform Presentations (Abstracts SPL1–SPL66)

Introduction: Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts is commonly used in day-to-day practice. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has been considered as a graft choice for primary ACL reconstruction due to its reliable graft size and resistance to rupture. The available literature comparing Quadriceps and Hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction is limited. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the functional outcomes of these autografts using suspensory fixation at the femoral and tibial sites. Aim: To compare the functional outcomes of quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A randomised controlled study was conducted at Department of Orthopaedics, BLDE’s Shri BM Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India, from January 2021 to April 2023. Thirty-four patients were included in the study and randomised into two groups: one group was operated with a quadriceps tendon graft, and the other group used a hamstring tendon autograft. Both groups underwent surgery using suspensory fixation, and postoperative rehabilitation was similar. Functional outcomes (assessed using Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores), return to preinjury activity, and complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare pre- and postoperative functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC scores) at 6, 12, and 24 months, with a significance level of p&lt;0.05. Results: Out of 34 patients, 27 (79%) were male and 7 (21%) were female. The follow-up period ranged from a minimum of 24 months to a maximum of 26 months. The mean Lysholm score in the hamstring group increased from 47 preoperatively to 92 at six months postoperatively, while in the quadriceps group, it increased from 46 preoperatively to 90 at six months postoperatively. The reliability and validity of the IKDC score for the hamstring group also increased from 46 preoperatively to 79 at six months, and for the quadriceps group, it increased from 44 preoperatively to 78 at six months. A total 31 of the cases (91%) returned to their preinjury activity, while 3 patients (9%) (2 from the hamstring group and 1 from the quadriceps group) experienced knee stiffness, which restricted their ability to squat and sit cross-legged. There were no significant differences in Lysholm and IKDC scores between the hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Patients undergoing single bundle ACL reconstruction have comparable functional outcomes with either hamstring or quadriceps grafts at the end of the 2-year follow-up period, with no specific graft site complications. The soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft can be considered as an equally viable option for graft selection.

Evaluation and comparison of clinical results of femoral fixation devices in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background:Understanding specific risk profiles for each patient and their propensity to experience clinically meaningful improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is important for preoperative patient counseling and management of expectations.Purpose:To develop machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at a minimum 2-year follow-up after ACLR.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:An ACLR registry of patients from 27 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons at a large academic institution was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six variables were tested for predictive value. The study population was randomly partitioned into training and independent testing sets using a 70:30 split. Six machine learning algorithms (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, adaptive gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression [ENPLR]) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation 3 times and internally validated on the independent set of patients. Algorithm performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision-curve analysis.Results:A total of 442 patients, of whom 39 (8.8%) did not achieve the MCID, were included. The 5 most predictive features of achieving the MCID were body mass index ≤27.4, grade 0 medial collateral ligament examination (compared with other grades), intratunnel femoral tunnel fixation (compared with suspensory), no history of previous contralateral knee surgery, and achieving full knee extension preoperatively. The ENPLR algorithm had the best relative performance (C-statistic, 0.82; calibration intercept, 0.10; calibration slope, 1.15; Brier score, 0.068), demonstrating excellent predictive ability in the study’s data set.Conclusion:Machine learning, specifically the ENPLR algorithm, demonstrated good performance for predicting a patient’s propensity to achieve the MCID for the IKDC score after ACLR based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. The femoral tunnel fixation method was the only significant intraoperative variable. Range of motion and medial collateral ligament integrity were found to be important physical examination parameters. Increased body mass index and prior contralateral surgery were also significantly predictive of outcome.

Background and objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most common knee operations. The graft fixation ways differ from suspensory fixation methods (Endobutton) to aperture fixation (Interference screws). The use of a hamstring tendon autograft has become a common choice among orthopedic surgeons because of less donor site problem. The aim of this study is to compare the functional outcome between suspensory fixation and aperture fixation of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods: Arthroscopic autogenous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed for forty-one patients who were divided into two groups, with a minimum of six months follow-up evaluation. The suspensory fixation group underwent endobutton fixation on the femoral side and interference screw on tibial side. The aperture fixation group underwent interference screw fixation at both femoral and tibial tunnels. Both groups were assessed and their functional outcomes were compared before surgery, at three months and six months by using Lysholm knee score. Results: There was significant improvement in functional outcome in both groups, at six months of follow-up, the Lysholm score in endobutton group improved from 77.2 to 93.2 and in interference screw group from 71.5 to 89. The endobutton group had better functional outcome when compared to interference screw group. Conclusions: The endobutton fixation provided better functional outcome at the end of six months when comparing the result. We recommend larger population and longer periods of follow-up.

This study compared the clinical outcomes of patients treated with described "modified all-inside" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique with those of patients treated with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw with the ACLR technique. From 2017 to 2019, 98 patients who underwent ACLR surgery by two surgeons using either of the techniques were included in this study. Patients in group 1 were treated with the "modified all-inside" ACLR technique. In this technique, only the semitendinosus tendon was harvested as a four-strand graft and fixed to the tibia and femur with suspensory buttons. Patients in group 2 were treated with suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw ACL reconstruction technique. Patients' functional outcomes were evaluated by the Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Postoperative knee stability of the patients was evaluated using the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test. The mean ages of the patients were 31.1 (16-55) and 28.7 (18-48) years in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The average follow-up durations were 26 (20-30) and 25.9 (22-30) months for both groups. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm's score, Tegner's activity score, and IKDC subjective score in groups 1 and 2. There were no major complications or reruptures in either group. ACLR incorporating the "modified all-inside" ACLR technique obtained significant clinical outcomes compared to ACLR with a suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw.

The Evaluation of Revascularization Following Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Vascular Angiography Imaging and Serum Vascular Markers (SS-40)

Objectives: The objective was to compare the functional outcomes and pain trajectories associated with aperture (BIOSCREW) versus suspensory (T-BUTTON) tibial fixation in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from June 2023 to February 2025. A total of 104 patients with isolated, complete ACL tears confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were enrolled and randomized into two groups: BIOSCREW ( n = 52) and T-BUTTON ( n = 52). Functional outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple time points postoperatively. Results: A total of 104 patients were included in the study, with mean age comparable between the groups (BIOSCREW: 31.69 ± 9.99 years; T-BUTTON: 30.48 ± 9.79 years). The majority of patients demonstrated Grade 2 anterior drawer test results (BIOSCREW: 61.5%, T-BUTTON: 59.6%). Pre-operative VAS scores were similar (BIOSCREW: 4.02; T-BUTTON: 4.15). Post-operative pain was initially higher in the T-BUTTON group (5.21 vs. 4.85) but equalized by 3 weeks. IKDC scores improved similarly in both groups across all time points. Conclusion: Both BIOSCREW and T-BUTTON tibial fixation techniques yield comparable outcomes in pain management and functional recovery following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendons and Cross-Pin Femoral Fixation Compared With Patellar Tendon Autografts

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the second-look arthroscopic findings of synovialization and the clinical results after the arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the fresh-frozen tibialis tendon allograft. Fifty-seven patients could be examined with the second-look arthroscopy after the ACL reconstruction with tibialis tendon allograft. The average duration from reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy was 18.4 months (range, 4 –48 months). The patients were classified, according to the extent of synovialization, into 3 groups; 37 cases (64.9%) in group A (good), 15 cases (26.3%) in group B (partial), and 5 cases (8.8%) in group C (poor). The clinical results were compared in each group. The 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score was 80 or more in 31 cases (83.8%) in group A, 9 (60%) in group B, and 1 (20%) in group C respectively. All thirty seven cases (100%) in group A had negative or 1+firm end-point Lachman test and negative pivot shift test, however, only 2 cases (40%) in group C. KT-1000 arthrometer measurement was less than 5 mm in 37 (100%) in group A, 14 (93.3%) in group B, and 2 (40%) in group C. According to the 2000 IKDC knee examination form, 37 (100%) in group A, 14 (93.3%) in group B, and 2 (40%) in group C respectively were normal or nearly normal. The synovialization of the graft had positive correlation with the clinical results after the ACL reconstruction with fresh-frozen allograft.

Background: Interest in the role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in preventing rotatory instability and the pivot-shift phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been recently renewed. Nevertheless, there is still concern about overconstraint of the lateral compartment of the knee and the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis (OA). Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare long-term subjective and objective outcomes and the rate of OA development between patients undergoing isolated ACLR (iACLR) with a hamstring tendon autograft and those with a combined Arnold-Coker modification of the McIntosh extra-articular procedure. Risk factors for long-term OA were evaluated. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 165 consecutive patients treated at a single center by ACLR. A total of 86 patients underwent iACLR (iACLR group) and 79 received combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction (ACLR+LET). The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores were administered. Knee stability was tested through the Lachman test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 knee arthrometer test. A positive pivot-shift test (++/+++), laxity on the KT-1000, and referred giving-way episodes or revision ACLR were considered failures. Radiographic results were assessed according to the Fairbank, IKDC, and Kellgren-Lawrence scales. Radiographic evaluation included both the overall tibiofemoral joint and the medial and lateral compartment separately. A univariate and a multivariate logistic regression with penalized maximum likelihood was used to identify risks factors associated with long-term OA. Results: The mean follow-up was 15.7 years. There were no statistically significant differences in subjective scores between the 2 groups. A side-to-side difference >5 mm on the KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation was found in 8 patients in the iACLR group and in 1 patient in the ACLR+LET group (P = .01). Nine cases of failure were found in the iACLR group and only 1 case was found in the ACLR+LET group (P = .0093). Patients in the iACLR group had a significantly higher OA grades than those in the ACLR+LET group for the overall tibiofemoral joint and the lateral compartment of the knee. No differences were found in the medial compartment. A higher level of lateral compartment OA was found in patients who received partial lateral meniscectomy in the iACLR group compared with those in the ACLR+LET group. Univariate and multivariate analysis results demonstrated that meniscectomy was the most significant factor for long-term OA development. Conclusion: A significantly higher risk of long-term OA was found with iACLR than with ACLR combined with the Arnold-Coker modification of the McIntosh extra-articular procedure. Knees with combined ACLR also had a significantly lower OA grade after partial lateral meniscectomy. Additionally, those undergoing combined ACLR had better knee stability and lower graft rupture rates at the long-term follow-up. Partial meniscectomy was the main risk factor negatively associated with OA changes.

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a very commonly done procedure in recent times. There is a need for a long-term outcome study of ACL reconstruction with a comparison between different types of fixation techniques. The graft fixation methods vary from aperture fixation (interference screws) to suspensory fixation methods (endobutton). Failure of graft incorporation and the development of tunnel widening (TW) after ACL reconstruction have been frequently reported in the long term in present literature. TW especially complicates revision ACL surgery. This is a prospective non-randomized clinical study of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction comparing the functional results between aperture fixation and suspensory fixation. Two groups of 14 patients who underwent autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction with a minimum of 2-year follow-up evaluation were included in the study. The first group underwent aperture fixation with bioabsorbable interference screw at tibial and femoral side. The second group underwent suspensory fixation with endobutton fixation on the femoral side and biointerference screw on the tibial side. Both group patients were examined clinically before surgery, and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and at 2 years. They were compared for functional outcome with Tegner Lysholm knee score. There was a significant improvement in functional outcome in both the groups for base and at 3 months, also for 3 months and 6 months but for 6 months-1 year. Group 2 is almost significant. This improvement in outcome in Group 2 is consistent from 1 year to 2 years. In our prospective study comparing the outcomes of functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction with aperture fixation versus suspensory fixation on the femur, which was evaluated using Tegner Lysholm knee score over a period of 2 years, suspensory fixation was found to be better. However, further studies involving a larger series of cases are required for a better evaluation of the outcome.

Quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACL reconstruction was hypothesized to possess less anterior knee laxity, pivot shift laxity, and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon (HT) autografts. Terms "hamstring tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" or "quadriceps tendon autograft" and "ACL reconstruction" were searched in Embase and PubMed. Inclusion criteria required that studies included patients treated for primary ACL injury with reconstruction using either a QT autograft (Group 1) or a HT autograft (Group 2) and instrumented anterior knee laxity assessment. Extracted information included surgical fixation method, graft type, graft thickness or diameter, single vs. double bundle surgical method, publication year, time between the index knee injury and surgery, % women, initial and final subject number, subject age, follow-up length, side-to-side anterior knee laxity difference, Lysholm Score, Subjective IKDC score, anterior knee laxity side-to-side difference grade, ipsilateral pivot shift laxity grade, and failure rate. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate study methodological quality. The QT group (Group 1) had 17 studies and the HT group (Group 2) had 61 studies. Overall, Group 2 had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59, p = 0.005). Group 2 suspensory femoral fixation had greater pivot shift laxity (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.58, p = 0.02) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation. Group 2 compression femoral fixation also had more anterior knee laxity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, p = 0.01) than Group 1 compression femoral fixation and higher failure rates based on initial (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.4, p = 0.002) and final (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.32-2.71, p = 0.0003) subject number. Failure rate for HT compression femoral fixation was greater than suspensory femoral fixation based on initial (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.52-2.84, p < 0.0001) and final (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.63-3.16, p < 0.0001) subject number. Overall, QT autografts had less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates based on final subject number than HT autografts. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had lower pivot shift laxity than suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation. Compression QT autograft femoral fixation had less anterior knee laxity and lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Suspensory HT autograft femoral fixation had lower failure rates than compression HT autograft femoral fixation. Greater knee laxity and failure rates may be related to a combination of HT autograft diameter and configuration (tissue quality and dimensions, strands, bundles, and suturing method) variability and fixation mode. Level IV.

Background: Previous studies have examined the relationship between patient resilience and functional outcome scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, past studies have failed to explore the longitudinal relationship between preoperative resilience and functional outcomes 2 years after ACLR. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between preoperative patient resilience and functional outcomes 2 years after ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were identified who underwent ACLR for anterior cruciate ligament tears between January and June 2020 at a single institution. Those who completed the Brief Resilience Scale preoperatively as part of routine patient questionnaires were considered for inclusion. Patients were contacted a minimum of 2 years after ACLR to complete the short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form, and visual analog scale (VAS). Outcomes were compared among patients with low resilience (LR), normal resilience (NR), and high resilience (HR), as defined in a previous study.23 Results: A total of 81 patients were included in the final analysis, with 14 patients in the low preoperative resilience group, 54 in normal, and 13 in high. The mean age of the cohort was 32.0 years, and there were no significant differences in age, sex, race, graft type, or psychiatric comorbidities among the resilience groups. Significantly increased postoperative KOOS-JR scores were observed in patients in the HR group as compared with those in the NR and LR groups (94.8, 86.7, and 79.6, respectively; P = .031). There were also significantly increased postoperative SANE scores in patients in the HR group versus those in the NR and LR groups (92.3, 83.5, and 69.2; P = .012). Patients with high preoperative resilience achieved the IKDC Patient Acceptable Symptom State at significantly higher rates (P = .003). No significant differences were observed in postoperative VAS (P = .364), IKDC (P = .072), or change in IKDC (P = .448) over time among resilience groups. Postoperatively, 30 patients (37.0%) changed resilience groups, with 13 moving down and 17 moving up in category (low, n = 12; normal, n = 55; high, n = 14). Conclusion: Preoperative resilience correlated with KOOS-JR and SANE scores 2 years after ACLR but did not correlate with VAS, IKDC, or change in IKDC over the same period. Resilience was not static, with changes in resilience observed from initial to final evaluations. Resilience is not a strong predictor of postoperative patient-reported outcomes after ACLR.