Abstract

Deep learning is increasingly used in short-term load forecasting. However, deep learning models are difficult to train, and adjusting training hyper-parameters takes time and effort. Automated machine learning (AutoML) can reduce human participation in machine learning process and improve the efficiency of modelling while ensuring the accuracy of prediction. In this paper, we compare the usage of three AutoML approaches in short-term load forecasting. The experiments on a real-world dataset show that the predictive performance of AutoGluon outperforms that of AutoPytorch and Auto-Keras, according to three performance metrics: MAE, RMSE and MAPE. AutoPytorch and Auto-Keras have similar performance and are not easy to compare.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.