Abstract

This research compares the potential environmental impacts of heat pumps with gas boilers and scenario analysis through utilising the life cycle approach. The study analyses the current situation with the baseline model and assesses future applications with Circular Economy (CE), Resource Efficiency (RE) and Limited Growth (LG) scenarios. Then, hybrid applications of low-carbon technologies and different manufacturing scenarios are investigated according to baseline and CE scenarios. Our results show that the use and manufacturing phases are responsible for 74% and 14% of all environmental impacts on average as expected. Even though the electricity mix of the UK has decarbonised substantially during the last decade, heat pumps still have higher lifetime impacts than gas boilers in all environmental categories except climate change impact. The carbon intensity of heat pumps is much lower than gas boilers with 0.111 and 0.097 kg CO2e for air source heat pumps and ground source heat pumps, whereas the boiler stands as 0.241 kg CO2e. Future scenarios offer significant reductions in most of the impact categories. The CE scenario has the highest potential with a 44% reduction for heat pumps and 27% for gas boilers on average. RE and LG scenarios have smaller potential than the CE scenario, relatively. However, several categories expect an increase in future scenarios such as freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity and metal depletion categories. High deployment of offshore wind farms will have a negative impact on these categories; therefore, a comprehensive approach through a market introduction programme should be provided at the beginning before shifting from one technology to another. The 50% Hybrid scenario results expect a reduction of 24% and 20% on average for ASHP and GSHP, respectively, in the baseline model. The reduction is much lower in the CE scenario, with only a 2% decrease for both heat pumps because of the reduction in heat demand in the future. These results emphasise that even though the importance of the use phase is significant in the baseline model, the remaining phases will play an important role to achieve Net-Zero targets in the future.

Highlights

  • The simulation results have been illustrated per functional unit, and the lifetime results are divided into the amount of total space heating demand for both heat pumps and gas boilers as the functional unit is decided as ‘generating 1 kWh of thermal energy for domestic heating’

  • When individual impact categories were investigated, the results illustrated that natural gas boilers (NGB) has the lowest impact in all categories except Climate Change (CC)—(CC (Climate Change), OD (Ozone Depletion), TA (Terrestrial Acidification), FEU (Freshwater Eutrophication), MEU (Marine Eutrophication), HT (Human Toxicity), POF (Photochemical Oxidant Formation), Particulate Matter Formation (PMF)

  • The Transport (SK) scenario results show that changing the manufacturing location could increase the environmental impacts on average 3% and 1% for Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP) and ground-source heat pump (GSHP), respectively, according to the Circular Economy (CE) 2050 model (Figure 7)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2018, 55% of the global population lived in cities, and this is expected to reach 68%. Cities are globally responsible for 75% of primary energy consumption [2] and. 60–80% of greenhouse gas emissions [3]. The built environment is responsible for 36% of global energy consumption and 39% of energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [4]. Use emissions such as heating, cooling, lighting, and cooking account for 72% of these emissions and the remaining comes from embodied emissions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call