Abstract
This article compares the performance of sliding vs. elastomeric seismic isolation in a typical Multi-Span Continuous Concrete Girder bridge using advanced nonlinear seismic isolator models. The Friction Pendulum System (FPS) and the Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) are selected as representative examples of sliding and elastomeric isolators, respectively. The newly presented LRB model captures the horizontal and vertical coupling of the response and allows monitoring the strength and stiffness fluctuations in the time domain. The elastomeric scheme provides a more uniform response along the bridge, and imparts lower demand to the substructure but acquires higher displacements than the sliding alternative.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
