A comparative analysis of compressive and wear failure of laser-powder bed fused Stainless Steel 316L produced with different hatch spacing in stripe and contour patterns

Abstract

The selection of hatch spacing is crucial in additive manufacturing processes to produce a defect free Stainless Steel 316L (SS) components, especially in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. Improper selection of hatch spacing could lead to various failure regimes (like vertical cracking, porosity, and un-melted particles) in Stainless Steel 316L (SS) component produced through laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Further, the failure regimes have a direct impact on the hardness, compression strength, friction, and wear properties of LPBF SS components. The present study has taken substantial efforts to analyse the impact of various hatch spacing (0.08 mm, 0.10 mm. and 0.12 mm) in stripe and contour patterns, in terms of morphology, mechanical, and tribological properties of LPBF SS components. Also, the present study elucidates how variations in hatch spacing influences the features like particle fusion, crack formation, density, hardness, surface roughness, compression, and wear properties. The stripe pattern with low hatch spacing of 0.08 mm showed better particle fusion and high surface roughness; whereas the high hatch spacing has produced voids, un-melted powder particles, and cracks in the stripe and contour pattern. High densities and hardness values were attributed to the stripe patterns with more effective melting and fusing of powder particles. XRD analysis revealed the stable phase compositions across various hatch spacing with a predominant FCC crystal structure. Residual stress distribution was significantly influenced by the hatch spacing for both stripe and contour patterns. Importantly, the low hatch space leads has promoted the tensile residual stress formation and vice versa for the higher hatch spacing. Stripe patterns showed higher compression strengths with buckling and shear mode as a compression failure. The stripe pattern demonstrated a low specific wear rate (SWR) and coefficient of friction (COF) compared to the contour pattern, with respect to the various hatch spacing. Furthermore, the simulated body fluid (SBF) lubrication regime played a significant role in reducing the COF. Patches, groves, furrows, and craters demonstrated the abrasive and adhesive failure for both stripe and contour pattern, which is further detailed in the article.