Abstract
In recent years, Serious Games are being used as an innovative pedagogical strategy to achieve more effective learning in various fields of knowledge, but in order to use them effectively, it is essential to evaluate them systematically to obtain solid evidence of their impact. To this end, the integration of fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (FMADM) methods will be beneficial for the evaluation of Serious Games in order to weight their evaluation criteria according to the desired context, as these FMADMs have the capacity to take into account the imprecision and uncertainty of human judgements. In this paper, we will present a comparative analysis of various fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (FMADM) techniques, namely the fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy SWARA methods applied in the Serious Games evaluation model in which the fuzzy AHP method has been used. In order to find the ranking of various dimensions responsible for better decision making and the ability to accurately reflect human judgment for the evaluation of Serious Games in a given context. According to the results obtained, we find that the fuzzy AHP method was the best suited to our decision problem, despite the identical ranking of the criteria obtained.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
