Abstract

The addition of Mn to 7xxx series Al-alloys helps improve tensile properties owed to the presence of α precipitates (Al(Mn,Fe)Si, simple cubic, 50–200 nm, non-shearable) in addition to the η′ precipitates (Mg2Zn5−xAl2+x, hexagonal, 4–6 nm, shearable) commonly observed in the 7xxx series Al-alloys. The coexistence of multiple α and η′ variants, 24 for α and 4 for η′, coupled with their small size-scale, makes the experimental determination by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) challenging. This work formulates a phase-field model to predict precipitate shapes in three-dimension (3D) using experimental characterization as inputs to create virtual precipitate cross-sections for use in morphological comparison with experimental 2D (S)TEM images. Based on the atomic structures and orientation relationships observed in the experiments, the lattice site correspondences between the matrix and the two precipitate phases are derived, which are required for the prediction of shapes of coherent precipitates. Systematic phase-field simulations are then carried out to document the 3D shapes for all possible variants, as well as the corresponding 2D cross-sectional shapes when observed parallel to low-index matrix planes. These 2D cross-sectional shapes are compared with high-angle annular dark-field STEM (HAADF-STEM) images, which demonstrates that the identification of Mn precipitate type is possible by such comparisons. This helps unravel some of the complications encountered when characterizing precipitate microstructures in Mn containing Al-alloys by STEM. Finally, the equilibrium shapes as a function of precipitate size and the effect of interfacial energy anisotropy are investigated.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call