Abstract

Cutset conditioning and clique-tree propagation are two popular methods for exact probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks. Cutset conditioning is based on decomposition of a subset network nodes, whereas clique-tree propagation depends on aggregation of nodes. We characterize network structures in which the performances of these methods differ. We describe a means to combine cutset conditioning and clique-tree propagation in an approach called aggregation after decomposition (AD), which can perform inference relatively efficiently for certain network structures in which neither cutset conditioning nor clique-tree propagation performs well. We discuss criteria to determine when AD will perform more efficient belief-network inference than will clique-tree propagation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.