Abstract

The transition towards a Circular Economy (CE) in the built environment is vital to reduce resource consumption, emissions and waste generation. To support the development of circular building components, assessment metrics are needed. Previous work identified Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as an important method to analyse the environmental performance in a CE context. However, questions arise about how to model and calculate circular buildings components. We develop an LCA model for circular building components in four steps. First, we elaborate on the CE principles and LCA standards to identify requirements and gaps. Second, we adapt LCA standards and propose the ‘Circular Economy Life Cycle Assessment’ (CE-LCA) model. Third, we test the model by assessing an exemplary building component: the Circular Kitchen (CIK). Finally, we evaluate the CE-LCA model with 44 experts. In the CE-LCA model, building components are considered as a composite of parts and materials with different and multiple use cycles; the system boundary is extended to include these cycles, dividing the impacts using a circular allocation approach. The case of the CIK shows that the CE-LCA model supports an ex-ante assessment of circular building components in theoretical context; it makes an important step to support the transition to a circular built environment.

Highlights

  • The building sector is said to consume 40% of global resources, and to generate 33% of all emissions and 40% of waste globally (Ness and Xing, 2017)

  • For the BAU, adding two cycles (C+2) reduced impacts between 31% and 47% compared to its baseline scenario; for the Reclaim! kitchen, the reduction is only between 10% and 20%

  • The deviation is less as the difference between allocation fraction’ (Af) is larger when adding a re-use cycle to virgin material to material in a second use cycle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The building sector is said to consume 40% of global resources, and to generate 33% of all emissions and 40% of waste globally (Ness and Xing, 2017). We understand CE as “a regenerative system in which resource input and waste, emission, and energy leakage are minimised by slowing, closing and narrowing material and energy loops.” 759) Narrowing loops is reducing resource use E., increasing efficiency); slowing loops means prolonging the use of (building) components, parts and materials by extending lifespans and introducing multiple cycles; closing loops is to (re)cycle materials from End-of-Life (EoL) back to production (Bocken et al, 2016). The cycles in the CE can be divided into biological and technical material cycles (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2013). Examples of VRPs are reduce, repair, re-use, and recycle; we refer to the framework of Wouterszoon Jansen et al (2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call