Abstract

The eukaryotic Hsp90 chaperone machinery comprises many co-chaperones and regulates the conformation of hundreds of cytosolic client proteins. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Hsp90 machinery has become an attractive therapeutic target for diseases such as cancer. The compounds used so far to target this machinery affect the entire Hsp90 system. However, it would be desirable to achieve a more selective targeting of Hsp90-co-chaperone complexes. To test this concept, in this-proof-of-principle study, we screened for modulators of the interaction between Hsp90 and its co-chaperone Aha1, which accelerates the ATPase activity of Hsp90. A FRET-based assay that monitored Aha1 binding to Hsp90 enabled identification of several chemical compounds modulating the effect of Aha1 on Hsp90 activity. We found that one of these inhibitors can abrogate the Aha1-induced ATPase stimulation of Hsp90 without significantly affecting Hsp90 ATPase activity in the absence of Aha1. NMR spectroscopy revealed that this inhibitory compound binds the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 close to its ATP-binding site and overlapping with a transient Aha1-interaction site. We also noted that this inhibitor does not dissociate the Aha1-Hsp90 complex but prevents the specific interaction with the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 required for catalysis. In consequence, the inhibitor affected the activation and processing of Hsp90-Aha1-dependent client proteins in vivo We conclude that it is possible to abrogate a specific co-chaperone function of Hsp90 without inhibiting the entire Hsp90 machinery. This concept may also hold true for other co-chaperones of Hsp90.

Highlights

  • The eukaryotic Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) chaperone machinery comprises many co-chaperones and regulates the conformation of hundreds of cytosolic client proteins

  • Our findings demonstrate that it is in principle possible to selectively target the influence of Aha1 on Hsp90 by chemical compounds

  • This complex seems to be inefficient in progressing through the Hsp90 ATPase cycle because Aha1 cannot potently stimulate the N-terminal association of Hsp90 anymore

Read more

Summary

Results

We monitored the interaction between Hsp and Aha by FRET [22] to screen a compound library of ϳ15,000 chemical compounds. The apparent binding constant (KD app) of each modulator to the Hsp90 –Aha complex was determined by titration of the compounds in the ATPase assay. The affinity of Aha for Hsp is only marginally affected by the presence of HAM-1, both in the absence (from a KD of 3.12 Ϯ 0.65 to 4.70 Ϯ 0.74 ␮M) or presence of the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog AMP-PNP (from a KD of 2.55 Ϯ 0.30 ␮M to a KD ϭ 1.80 Ϯ 0.30 ␮M) (Fig. 2D). These findings show that the inhibitor HAM-1 does not prevent binding of Aha to Hsp, whereas at the same time, Aha is not able to stimulate Hsp efficiently anymore.

A Gly81 free HAM-1 bound
A CFTR wt
Discussion
Experimental procedures
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call