Abstract

Radiotherapy is involved in 50% of all cancer treatments and 40% of cancer cures. Most of these treatments are delivered in fractions of equal doses of radiation (Fractional Equivalent Dosing (FED)) in days to weeks. This treatment paradigm has remained unchanged in the past century and does not account for the development of radioresistance during treatment. Even if under-optimized, deviating from a century of successful therapy delivered in FED can be difficult. One way of exploring the infinite space of fraction size and scheduling to identify optimal fractionation schedules is through mathematical oncology simulations that allow for in silico evaluation. This review article explores the evidence that current fractionation promotes the development of radioresistance, summarizes mathematical solutions to account for radioresistance, both in the curative and non-curative setting, and reviews current clinical data investigating non-FED fractionated radiotherapy.

Highlights

  • Received: 21 December 2021Radiotherapy is involved in 50% of all cancer treatments and 40% of cancer cures today [1]

  • In addition to fractional equivalent dosing (FED), current radiotherapy is delivered in a short-predefined time period (Rule Two) at maximum tolerable dose aiming for tumor eradication

  • Biological mechanisms to confer resistance vary amongst these studies, all radioresistant clones were evolved through fractionated radiotherapy and displayed increased survival after radiation compared to the parental lines

Read more

Summary

A Century of Fractionated Radiotherapy

Nima Ghaderi 1,† , Joseph Jung 1,† , Sarah C.

Introduction
Review
Does Resistance Develop during Fractionated Radiotherapy?
Findings
Breaking Rule Two—Can Incurable Tumor Progression Be Delayed by Delivering
Current Clinical Data Utilizing Altered Fractionation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call