Abstract

Abstract. A multivariate analysis on flood variables is needed to design some hydraulic structures like dams, as the complexity of the routing process in a reservoir requires a representation of the full hydrograph. In this work, a bivariate copula model was used to obtain the bivariate joint distribution of flood peak and volume, in order to know the probability of occurrence of a given inflow hydrograph. However, the risk of dam overtopping is given by the maximum water elevation reached during the routing process, which depends on the hydrograph variables, the reservoir volume and the spillway crest length. Consequently, an additional bivariate return period, the so-called routed return period, was defined in terms of risk of dam overtopping based on this maximum water elevation obtained after routing the inflow hydrographs. The theoretical return periods, which give the probability of occurrence of a hydrograph prior to accounting for the reservoir routing, were compared with the routed return period, as in both cases hydrographs with the same probability will draw a curve in the peak-volume space. The procedure was applied to the case study of the Santillana reservoir in Spain. Different reservoir volumes and spillway lengths were considered to investigate the influence of the dam and reservoir characteristics on the results. The methodology improves the estimation of the Design Flood Hydrograph and can be applied to assess the risk of dam overtopping.

Highlights

  • Univariate flood frequency analyses have been carried out widely, focusing on the study of flood peaks, which are used for designing most of hydraulic structures

  • The full hydrograph is of interest in the case of dam design, as the inflow peak is transformed into a different outflow peak during the routing process in the reservoir

  • In the present paper a Monte Carlo procedure to obtain the return period linked to the risk of dam overtopping was carried out by a copula model, comparing it to the probability of occurrence of a flood

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Univariate flood frequency analyses have been carried out widely, focusing on the study of flood peaks, which are used for designing most of hydraulic structures. France uses a return period of 1000 to 10 000 yr depending on the dam typology; Austria fixes a return period of 5000 yr and Spain uses a return period of 500 to 10 000 yr depending on the dam typology and its downstream vulnerability (Minor, 1998; Rettemeier and Kongeter, 1998) They do not specify whether it is the return period of either the peak, or hydrograph volume or the entire hydrograph. The return period should be defined in terms of risk of either dam overtopping or downstream damages, instead of in terms of natural probability of occurrence of floods, to take into account the influence of reservoir and dam characteristics on the flood hydrograph routing process (Mediero et al, 2010). The routing process has to be studied in each dam

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call