Abstract

BackgroundAngelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations affecting UBE3A function. AS is characterized by intellectual disability, impaired motor coordination, epilepsy, and behavioral abnormalities including autism spectrum disorder features. The development of treatments for AS heavily relies on the ability to test the efficacy of drugs in mouse models that show reliable, and preferably clinically relevant, phenotypes. We previously described a number of behavioral paradigms that assess phenotypes in the domains of motor performance, repetitive behavior, anxiety, and seizure susceptibility. Here, we set out to evaluate the robustness of these phenotypes when tested in a standardized test battery. We then used this behavioral test battery to assess the efficacy of minocycline and levodopa, which were recently tested in clinical trials of AS.MethodsWe combined data of eight independent experiments involving 111 Ube3a mice and 120 wild-type littermate control mice. Using a meta-analysis, we determined the statistical power of the subtests and the effect of putative confounding factors, such as the effect of sex and of animal weight on rotarod performance. We further assessed the robustness of these phenotypes by comparing Ube3a mutants in different genetic backgrounds and by comparing the behavioral phenotypes of independently derived Ube3a-mutant lines. In addition, we investigated if the test battery allowed re-testing the same animals, which would allow a within-subject testing design.ResultsWe find that the test battery is robust across different Ube3a-mutant lines, but confirm and extend earlier studies that several phenotypes are very sensitive to genetic background. We further found that the audiogenic seizure susceptibility phenotype is fully reversible upon pharmacological treatment and highly suitable for dose-finding studies. In agreement with the clinical trial results, we found that minocycline and levodopa treatment of Ube3a mice did not show any sign of improved performance in our test battery.ConclusionsOur study provides a useful tool for preclinical drug testing to identify treatments for Angelman syndrome. Since the phenotypes are observed in several independently derived Ube3a lines, the test battery can also be employed to investigate the effect of specific Ube3a mutations on these phenotypes.

Highlights

  • Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations affecting Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A (UBE3A) function

  • We recently developed a number of behavioral tests for testing the effect of gene reinstatement in inducible Ube3amSTOP/p+ (Ube3atm1Yelg) mice [13]

  • We set out to assess the robustness of these phenotypes in an independently derived mouse model of AS, by using F1 hybrid 129S2-C57BL/6J Ube3am−/p+ (Ube3atm1Alb) mice [7], which is the Ube3a mouse mutant used for most behavioral studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations affecting UBE3A function. The development of treatments for AS heavily relies on the ability to test the efficacy of drugs in mouse models that show reliable, and preferably clinically relevant, phenotypes. The development of targeted treatments for AS heavily relies on the ability to test the efficacy of treatments in mouse models of the disorder The success of such translational studies depends on three critical factors [5]: (1) high construct validity, (2) high face validity, and (3) robustness of the behavioral phenotypes. With respect to face validity (i.e., similarity of phenotypes between patient and the mouse model), the AS mouse model captures many neurological key features of the disorder really well (e.g., epilepsy, motor deficits, abnormal EEG), as well as some of the behavioral abnormalities (abnormal sleep patterns, increased anxiety, repetitive behavior) [7–12]. Almost all behavioral testing described in literature has been performed using the original Ube3atm1Alb mouse strain generated in the Beaudet lab [7–9]; it is unknown to what extent the reported phenotypes are specific to this mouse line

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call