Abstract

Current phylogenomic data sets highlight the need for species tree methods able to deal with several sources of gene tree/species tree incongruence. At the same time, we need to make most use of all available data. Most species tree methods deal with single processes of phylogenetic discordance, namely, gene duplication and loss, incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) or horizontal gene transfer. In this manuscript, we address the problem of species tree inference from multilocus, genome-wide data sets regardless of the presence of gene duplication and loss and ILS therefore without the need to identify orthologs or to use a single individual per species. We do this by extending the idea of Maximum Likelihood (ML) supertrees to a hierarchical Bayesian model where several sources of gene tree/species tree disagreement can be accounted for in a modular manner. We implemented this model in a computer program called guenomu whose inputs are posterior distributions of unrooted gene tree topologies for multiple gene families, and whose output is the posterior distribution of rooted species tree topologies. We conducted extensive simulations to evaluate the performance of our approach in comparison with other species tree approaches able to deal with more than one leaf from the same species. Our method ranked best under simulated data sets, in spite of ignoring branch lengths, and performed well on empirical data, as well as being fast enough to analyze relatively large data sets. Our Bayesian supertree method was also very successful in obtaining better estimates of gene trees, by reducing the uncertainty in their distributions. In addition, our results show that under complex simulation scenarios, gene tree parsimony is also a competitive approach once we consider its speed, in contrast to more sophisticated models.

Highlights

  • Phylogenetic inference can be conducted independently for each gene alignment, and in a second step the species tree is inferred from the resulting gene trees

  • Most supertree approaches neglect the gene tree branch lengths, but there is another class of species tree methods closely related to the supertree methods which are based on the multispecies coalescent

  • Guenomu’s Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimates were very similar to iGTP under duplications and losses (DL) cost (KS test P > 0.5), slightly more accurate according to a paired test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phylogenetic inference can be conducted independently for each gene alignment, and in a second step the species tree is inferred from the resulting gene trees. Most supertree approaches neglect the gene tree branch lengths, but there is another class of species tree methods closely related to the supertree methods which are based on the multispecies coalescent These methods try to reconstruct the species tree from a matrix of distances between species, which in turn is built based on distance matrices from the individual gene trees (reviewed in Liu et al 2009a; Helmkamp et al 2012). 65 assume that the sequences represent individuals from a given orthologous region, this probability is given by the multispecies coalescent, that describes how lineages coalesce conditioned on a species tree (Rannala and Yang 2003) Under this model, Bayesian methods have already been implemented to estimate the posterior distribution of species trees, together with ancestral population sizes and divergence times (Edwards et al 2007; Heled and Drummond 2010). The probability P(Ti | ,) of supertree generating tree Ti is given by

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call