Abstract

Environmental monitoring studies provide key information to assess ecosystem health. Results of chemical monitoring campaigns can be used to identify the exposure scenarios of regulatory concern. In environmental risk assessment (ERA), measured concentrations of chemicals can be used to model predicted environmental concentrations (PECs). As the PEC is, by definition, a predicted variable, it is highly dependent on the underlying modeling approach from which it is derived. We demonstrate the use of Bayesian distributional regression models to derive PECs by incorporating spatiotemporal conditional variances, and limits of quantification (LOQ) and detection (LOD) as de facto data censoring. Model accuracies increase when incorporating spatiotemporal conditional variances, and the inclusion of LOQ and LOD results in potentially more robust PEC distributions. The methodology is flexible, credibly quantifies uncertainty, and can be adjusted to different scientific and regulatory needs. Posterior sampling allows to express PECs as distributions, which makes this modeling procedure directly compatible with other Bayesian ERA approaches. We recommend the use of Bayesian modeling approaches with chemical monitoring data to make realistic and robust PEC estimations and encourage the scientific debate about the benefits and challenges of Bayesian methodologies in the context of ERA.

Highlights

  • Environmental monitoring is a key component in the assessment of ecosystem health.[1]

  • We explore the possibilities of Bayesian distributional regression models to model the predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) distributions of a selection of Norwegian monitoring campaigns

  • Based on three aquatic chemical monitoring campaigns covering 8− 145 chemicals, we demonstrate an example workflow for PEC derivation

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Environmental monitoring is a key component in the assessment of ecosystem health.[1]. Environmental concentrations of chemicals are usually thought to have originated from processes that can be described by a lognormal distribution.[19] the spatiotemporal variations of the measured environmental concentrations can be interpreted as conditional variances of these measured concentrations: for every value of a temporal and spatial variable (i.e., dates and sites), a different variance on the overall concentration is assumed. This allows to distinguish between the “static” background concentrations in the water body and the influence of spatiotemporal variations, making predictions more robust. We further reflect on the benefits and challenges of the proposed methodology and encourage the discussion about scientific and regulatory suitability

MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■ REFERENCES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call