Abstract
This study seeks to analyze the arguments used by Brazilian federal deputies in the first voting of Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment in April 2016. The proposal is to perform an analysis anchored on three bases: a content analysis, network analysis and argumentative analysis. It is intended to discover how the deputies argued and which are the discursive differences observed among those who voted for and who voted against the process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
