Abstract
Abstract Purpose We compared objective brain vital sign metrics derived from event-related potentials (ERPs) of mixed martial arts (MMA) athletes and matched control participants. Methods We recorded 101 successful EEG scans from 12 MMA athletes (24.8 ± 2.6 yr) and 18 matched control participants (26.5±3.5 yr). For this analysis, only “baseline” scans were considered (n=30). “Baseline” was at least 90 days from a previous fight and 90 days (MMA) or 1 year (control) following medical clearance from a previously diagnosed concussion. We derived objective, clinical metrics (brain vital signs) from ERPs for auditory sensation (N100), basic attention (P300), and cognitive processing (N400) evoked while participants listen to a 6-minute auditory stimulus sequence. EEG data were processed using standard methods. N100, P300, and N400 amplitudes and latencies were manually identified on evoked potential waveforms by a blinded reviewer. Differences between groups at the waveform level were evaluated with a mass-univariate analysis using non-parametric resampling. Brain vital signs were compared across groups with a Kruskal-Wallis H-test for independent samples, with FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Results Mass-univariate waveform analyses showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between MMA athletes and controls in both P300 and N400 ERPs. The Kruskal-Wallis test identified a significant difference in N400 amplitude (H=7.04, P=.008, Padj=.047) between MMA athletes and controls. Conclusions MMA athletes demonstrate significant differences in “baseline” brain vital signs compared to controls, indicating that exposure to repetitive head impacts in MMA may be associated with subconcussive changes in brain function.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.