Abstract

Amidst rapid technological change, aggravating financial uncertainty, and escalating community expectations, librarians at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly, SLO) recognized that nimble responsiveness required reinvention of processes, procedures, and services. They understood that this would require changing how they think and what they think about, as they readied themselves for new roles in the academic enterprise. Concurrently, librarians in this comprehensive polytechnic teaching university observed a consistent pattern of declining gate counts and diminishing reference transactions, despite student enrollment increases to 18,500 in AY2005-06. These data suggested that even the traditional library as place role was eroding at this institution, which offers a wide range of baccalaureate and master’s degree programs. Librarians were not alone in recognizing that the was increasingly marginalized on campus: when campus administrators announced permanent budget cuts, the library’s share was consistently greater than other academic support units. So when a new group leader was hired in September 2003, public services librarians agreed to examine the underlying assumptions and beliefs that historically guided research, information, and instruction delivery decisions. They also chose to use systems thinking tools to build larger frames of reference capable of bridging boundaries within the and across the campus. These choices affirmed that “no matter what the previous history, every system can be altered and reinvented” 1 – i.e., if organizations are constructed, they can be reconstructed. 2 Since both individual and collective change begins with the onset of research, librarians recognized that the question of what to study was critically important. As this case study illustrates, it has proven equally important to consider the question of how – and with whom - to conduct evidence-generating research projects to enable organizational learning. The university’s distinguishing student-centric learn by doing educational philosophy also informed selection of their professional research-in-practice approach. It drove librarians’ agreement to invite student-generated research projects on services and systems, with the aim of obtaining authentic perspectives on user experience expectations, preferences, wants, and needs. This approach required relinquishing control of the research process: students, with faculty supervision, generated problem definitions, chose research methodologies, conducted data analysis, and produced results reports. Progressive student research reports offered opportunities for librarians to engage with student and faculty researchers for the purpose of ascertaining the implications of findings for services and systems. Iterative dialogue fostered sustainable communication which altered relationships, processes, and practices. Through the application of collaborative evidence-based information practice (EBIP), the Cal Poly moved from a service to a learning culture. This chapter describes Cal Poly’s collaborative EBIP approach and illustrates key application projects.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call