Abstract
Abstract Background Zoonotic diseases are high-yield material, frequently tested on USMLE Step 1. For learning infectious diseases, many medical students supplement or replace coursework with outside resources that are personalizable and utilize active learning1,2, but these resources can be prohibitively expensive, have questionable reliability, and align imperfectly with course content2. Spencer Fox Eccles SOM historically used a Team-Based Learning (TBL) format for teaching zoonotic diseases, but this content is primarily memorization-based, while TBL is well suited for conceptual material. To teach zoonotic diseases, we created a trivia game3 (“ZooTrivia”) to mimic the low-stakes, fast-paced, engagement of outside resources, while still capturing the cooperative learning environment of TBL. Methods We used the Kirkpatrick model for student reaction and learning to assess efficacy of ZooTrivia. The session was opt-in and students chose their own teams to answer trivia questions. All answers were provided at the end. We used attendance data and surveys to assess student enjoyment of and perceived learning from ZooTrivia. Results Twenty (20/125) students reported attending ZooTrivia. Three students, who do not usually attend class, chose to attend ZooTrivia, which suggests that trivia is an attractive format. 60% of attendees reported that they would like more games like this in their education. 30% responded that they would “maybe” want more games like this. For enjoyment, students on average reported preferring trivia over both TBL and outside resources (average 3.9 and 3.6, respectively on a scale of 1-5). However, for student learning, students on average reported TBL and outside resources as better learning formats (average 2.8 for both, on a scale of 1-5). Conclusion Trivia is an alternative to TBL-based learning of zoonotic disease that students report enjoying more but learning slightly less than TBL. Analysis of student learning was limited by incomparable attendance of ZooTrivia and TBL; ZooTrivia was an optional session, while TBL was required attendance. This comparison is a direction for future study. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.