Abstract

Remote monitoring of CGM data of children and youth attending diabetes camp has been shown to reduce overall and nocturnal hypoglycemia, compared to treatment decisions based on self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) values. However, some diabetes camps still require regular SMBG testing. We compared at-home versus at-camp glucose control where CGM data were used as the basis for diabetes treatment decisions. Thirty-four campers with T1D (mean±SD age 12±3 years, A1C 7.5±1.2%) were eligible for inclusion if they were using Control-IQ technology (Tandem Diabetes Care) prior to and during their attendance at Camp Buck, a diabetes-focused facility near Lake Tahoe. At camp, their CGM data (Dexcom G6) were integrated with the CampViews EMR system (Nevada-California Diabetes Association). CGM data from at-home and at-camp intervals were compared. As shown in the Table, mean glucose and overall time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) improved at camp, with statistical significance in the overnight (10PM-6AM) interval. Although time in Level 1 hypoglycemia increased at camp, there were no significant changes between at-home and at-camp levels of Level 2 hypoglycemia. CGM data can be used nonadjunctively in the camp setting to maintain or improve glycemic control. Centralized remote monitoring of glucose data allows camp attendees and staff to safely reduce or eliminate SMBG testing. Disclosure S.E.Gleich: Research Support; Dexcom, Inc. H.R.Tecca: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. N.D.Gibson-north: None. S.B.Andrade: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. J.Welsh: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. E.Schuster: Employee; Dexcom, Inc. T.C.Walker: Employee; Dexcom, Inc., Stock/Shareholder; Dexcom, Inc.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call