57 Particles in Outdoor Air: are they all Equal?

Abstract

Abstract Statement from the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) on the differential toxicity of particulate matter according to source or constituents Particulate matter in outdoor air comes from a wide range of different sources and contains many different chemical components. Understanding which of these sources and components are particularly harmful would help to focus policies and interventions to reduce impacts on health. COMEAP recently (July 2022) published an updated statement on this topic, drawing on recent reviews of the available evidence. It noted that particulate matter, and constituents of particulate matter, associated with combustion and road traffic have received the most research attention. However, there was insufficient coherence in the epidemiological evidence to conclude that these sources of particulate matter play a significantly greater role in the health effects of particulate air pollution than other sources or constituents. A comprehensive review of the evidence reveals that toxicity has been attributed to a wide variety of constituents and sources, possibly acting by a number of different mechanisms. However, the complexity of sources, sizes and chemical composition of particulate matter makes it extremely difficult to identify which characteristics of particles might make them less harmful or more toxic than others. Future research assessing the influence of chemical composition of particulate matter should offer greater insights into toxicity. But, at present, PM2.5 (the mass concentration of fine particulate matter in air) remains the most suitable metric for evaluating health impacts and regulating particulate air pollution.