470 Percutaneous arterial closure devices and ultrasound-guided trans-femoral puncture observational investigation: insights from the PETRONIO registry

Abstract

Abstract Aims To evaluate the safety of a single and combined use of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture (U) and percutaneous arterial closure devices (P) in femoral artery procedures (FAP) compared to fluoroscopic guidance (F) and manual compression (M) in a large radial-focused interventional centre. U and P, taken individually, have improved safety in femoral arterial access procedures compared to traditional techniques. Methods and results All FAP performed between July 2017 and December 2018 in our centre were divided into three phases: (i) control period with F and M mainly performed; (ii) phase out period where U and P were introduced; and (iii) intervention period where a 6-month expertise on the novel techniques was acquired. The overall population was further stratified into subgroups: F/M, U/M, F/P, and U/P. The primary study endpoint was in-hospital access site bleeding events (BE) according to the BARC criteria. The secondary endpoint was vascular site complications (VASC). 418 procedures (14%) out of 3025 were performed via FA access during the study period. The overall access-site in-hospital BE were 97 (23%). Decreasing rates of BE (phase 1: n = 46, 29%; phase 2: n = 38, 22% e phase 3: n = 13, 15%; P = 0.027) and VASC were observed during the three periods. BE occurred significantly more often in F/M group (F/M: n = 48; 32%; U/M: n = 12, 16%; F/P: n = 18, 21%; U/P: n = 19, 17%; P = 0.008). F/M subgroup was an independent predictor of BE both in multivariable analysis and propensity score matching analysis. Conclusions The introduction of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture and percutaneous arterial closure devices has reduced access site bleeding with a progressive improvement after the first 6 months learning period.