(452) Glans Necrosis is Not a Risk for Simple Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Insertion Performed via Subcoronal Incision

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Some studies have questioned subcoronal incision via IPP as a risk factor for glans ischemia or necrosis. We analyzed the largest ever reported series of IPP via subcoronal incision. Objective To report complications related with subcoronal incision for IPP placement Methods We studied 898 men who had subcoronal IPP placement from 5/2015-3/2022 by single surgeon. 817 were first-time patients under local anesthesia, with 81 revisions under spinal anesthesia including 707 circumcised and 181 uncircumcised subjects. Most (76%) uncircumcised men underwent coincident circumcision; the remainder refused. Implants were Coloplast Titan (489) and AMS 700 (329) in 329 (36.6%) diabetics and 38 (4%) Peyronie’s. We report postoperative occurrence of device infections and glans/penile skin problems. Results Mean follow up was 47.3 months (3-81 months). Modeling (64%) and corporal relaxing incisions (36%) straightened the Peyronie’s patients. Transient distal penile skin edema which resolved within 2 to 4 months was noted in 673 cases (74.9%). Edema developed in 68.3% previously circumcised patients, 100% of concomitant circumcised patients and 96.2% of patients who had refused circumcision. One previously circumcised patient experienced prolonged edema of 7 months. Five previously circumcised patients (0.5%) developed partial distal penile skin necrosis on the proximal side of the subcoronal incision (Figure-1) with all but one healing without grafting. The other patient sustained necrotic wound dehiscence which led to device infection and removal. There were zero cases of glans ischemia or necrosis. Only 2 patients became infected (0.2%). Conclusions Subcoronal incision for simple IPP placement or revision is not an independent risk factor for glans ischemia or necrosis. Most postoperative patients do experience transient distal penile skin edema without glans involvement which heals without sequelae regardless of circumcision status. Very rarely (0.5%) penile skin loss may occur. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, International Medical Devices, Rigicon, Uramix.