Abstract
Abstract Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP) for esophageal cancer is reported to have superiority in preserving postoperative respiratory function and reducing postoperative respiratory complications. In Japan, the majority of patients with esophageal cancer are smokers and have obstructive ventilation disorders. But, the feasibirity and safety of TEP for patients with low respiratory function is unclear. Objectives To clarify the feasibirity and safety of TEP for esophageal cancer patients with obstructive respiratory function. Methods The 95 patients with obstructive respiratory disorder who underwent TEP and gastric tube reconstruction via posterior mediastinal route for esophageal cancer from January 2016 to April 2019 were divided into the two groups, low respiratory function (LRF) group and the control group. Short-term outcomes were compared between two groups. Results The control group was 73 cases, and the LRF group was 22 cases. Propensity score matching using age, gender, cT, and cN as covariates was used to identify matched patients (22 per group) in both groups. There were no differences in operation time of overall and intrathoracic part, or blood loss in each group. In the postoperative complications, pneumonia (13.6% vs. 9.1%), recurrent laryngeal palsy (18.2% vs. 22.7%), anastomotic leakage (13.6% vs. 13.6%) and hospital stay (36.3 days vs 27.5 days) were no differences in both groups. Conclusion TEP can be feasible and safe for the patients with obstructive ventilation disorder and low respiratory function.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have