Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Guidelines recommend renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy at the maximal tolerated dose to achieve optimal treatment benefits in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). However, hyperkalemia (HK) is a barrier to achieving guideline-directed target dosing and RAASi treatment is often compromised in patients who experience HK. Current international guidelines recommend novel oral anti-HK treatments to manage HK and facilitate RAASi therapy. This study assessed the extent of both temporary and longer-term discontinuation of RAASi following an HK episode, and the magnitude of RAASi re-initiation, in cardiorenal patients in the US and Japan. Method This observational study used data from hospital records and claims from the US (Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data) and Japan (Medical Data Vision). Patients with an index HK event (ICD-10 code E87.5) during July 2019–September 2021 (US) or May 2020–February 2022 (Japan) with a prior diagnosis of CKD and/or HF and use of RAASi in the preceding 6 months were included. RAASi classes included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi). In patients who discontinued RAASi treatment following their index HK episode, duration of discontinuation was described within a time frame of 6 months from the date of discontinuation (those with <6 months follow-up time were excluded). The RAASi dose prior to discontinuation versus at re-initiation was also assessed. Results In total, 25,963 patients from the US and 8,722 from Japan were included. The mean age was 68.3 (US) and 74.8 (Japan) years; 53% and 65% were male; and 30% and 12% of patients had a recorded history of HK prior to their index event. In the US, 85% filled a RAASi prescription in the 3 months prior to HK episode; the most common RAASi classes were ACEi (used by 46% of the overall cohort), ARB (27%), and MRA (19%). In Japan, 91% filled a RAASi prescription in the 3 months prior to HK episode; ARB was the most common (67%), followed by MRA (25%), and ACEi (16%). ARNi was used by <5% of patients in the US and <2% in Japan; it was not assessed further due to low patient numbers. Following the HK episode, ACEi/ARB were discontinued in 23–26% of patients, while MRA was discontinued in 33–46% (Table 1). In those who discontinued, re-initiation within 6 months occurred among 10–15% of patients in the US and among 6–8% of patients in Japan. In those who re-initiated, 17–37% of patients in the US and Japan had their dose reduced by >25%. Conclusion In clinical practice, HK leads to discontinuation of RAASi treatment despite guidelines recommending maintained treatment. Re-challenge of RAASi treatment is uncommon and, when re-introduced, the dose is commonly reduced. These findings emphasize the need for improved guideline adherence in managing HK to facilitate continued RAASi therapy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call