320 Effects of Sorting Strategy on Within-Pen Variation and Profitability

Abstract

Abstract Decreasing variation in a pen of feedlot cattle reduces overfeeding, increases carcass quality and uniformity, and improves economic returns. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sorting by body weight (BW) or expected days on feed (DOF) on pen performance and profitability. Ninety-six Angus-cross steers (initial BW = 360 ± 28 kg) were randomly assigned to sorting by BW or DOF determined using the Davis Growth Model and initial body measurements for BW, hip height, back fat thickness (BF), and ribeye area. Steers within BW and DOF sort groups were randomly assigned to one of two replicates. Within replicate, BW groups were divided into light and heavy pens (initial BW = 323 and 366 kg, respectively), and DOF groups were divided into short and long pens (DOF = 119 and 160 d, respectively), for a total of 8 pens with 12 steers in each pen. Pen feeding was managed using the slick bunk method and time of marketing was determined based on observation of an average pen BF of 1.1 cm. Steers were harvested at a commercial abattoir and individual carcass characteristics were recorded. Profit was calculated as carcass value minus feed costs. For comparison of sorting treatments, pen was the experimental unit, and treatment means and variances were compared using a t-test and F-test, respectively. Steers were harvested in three groups: both heavy-BW sort pens and both short-DOF sort pens were harvested after 84 d, both long-DOF sort pens and one light-BW sort pen were harvested after 104 d, and the final light-BW sort pen was harvested after 116 d on the finishing ration. There were no differences in mean initial BW (P = 0.95) or initial percent empty body fat (EBF; P = 0.28), but variation in initial BW was reduced (P < 0.01) for the BW sort group. Final mean BW did not differ between sort groups (P = 0.54), but variance in final BW and hot carcass weight was less (P < 0.01) for the group sorted by BW. Final percent EBF also did not differ between groups (P = 0.41), but percent EBF variance was 2.4 %-units for DOF and 2.9 %-units for BW sorted pens, although differences were not statistically significant. There were no differences in average daily gain or feed conversion rate between sort groups. Variation in yield grade, BF, and marbling score were numerically reduced for the DOF group; however, differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.10). Average profit per steer was $ 321.42 and $ 235.05 for DOF and BW sorted groups, respectively. Sorting by DOF increased profitability by 26% by increasing harvest BW, improving uniformity, and decreasing overweight carcasses.