Abstract

Johan Fredrikzon spent one and a half years as a visiting research assistant at the Film and Media Studies Program at Yale University 2018/2019. Some months before he arrived, a two-day workshop on Simondon was held by the Yale-Düsseldorf Working Group on Philosophy and Media, titled Modes of Technical Objects, with scholars from the US and Germany. Fredrikzon decided to engage a few of the workshop participants for this special issue of Sensorium, with the purpose to discuss perspectives on Simondon as a theoretical instrument for thinking technology, how the French philosopher matters in their work, and why there seems to be a revival in the interest in the writing of Simondon these days. On behalf of the Sensorium journal, the interviewer would like to thank the three interviewees for their generous participation.
 About Paul North:
 Paul North is Professor at the Department of Germanic Languages & Literatures at Yale University. He teaches on media and literature from Ancient Greece through the romantic and enlightenment traditions into 20th century literary and critical theory. In The Yield: Kafka’s Atheological Reformation (Stanford, 2015) North presented a largely unknown Kafka based on readings of the famous writer’s theoretical works at the end of World War I. Paul North’s new book, Bizarre Privileged Items in the Universe: The Logic of Likeness (Zone Books, 2021) diverges from centuries of thought focused on the idea of difference to engage deeply with the concept of likeness: in evolution, in natural and social worlds, in language and in art. More on: paulnorth.org.

Highlights

  • Johan Fredrikzon: You have called Simondon the inversion of Heidegger

  • Writing at roughly the same time, was Simondon directly influenced by Heidegger? Paul North: Well, the fifties in France was a time of transition, when everyone was in love with Heidegger

  • Simondon’s On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects and parts of Being and Time share an idea that the world is interactive, and that tools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Johan Fredrikzon: You have called Simondon the inversion of Heidegger. Writing at roughly the same time, was Simondon directly influenced by Heidegger? Paul North: Well, the fifties in France was a time of transition, when everyone was in love with Heidegger. Writing at roughly the same time, was Simondon directly influenced by Heidegger? Simondon’s On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects and parts of Being and Time share an idea that the world is interactive, and that tools,

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.