2D versus 3D comparison of angiographic imaging biomarkers using computational fluid dynamics simulations of contrast injections.

Abstract

Quantitative angiography (QAngio) may provide hemodynamic information during neurointerventional procedures through imaging biomarkers related to contrast flow. The standard clinical implementation of QAngio is limited by projection imaging: analysis of contrast motion within complex 3D geometries is restricted to 1-2 projection views, truncating the potential wealth of imaging biomarkers related to disease progression or efficacy of treatment. To understand the limitations of 2D biomarkers, we propose the use of in-silico contrast distributions to investigate the potential benefits of 3D-QAngio within the context of neurovascular hemodynamics. Ground-truth in-silico contrast distributions were generated in two patient-specific intracranial aneurysm models, accounting for the physical interactions of contrast media and blood. A short bolus of contrast was utilized to obtain full a wash-in/ wash-out cycle within the aneurysm ROI. Simulated angiograms mimicking clinical cone-beam CT (CBCT) acquisitions were then generated, and volumetric contrast distributions were reconstructed to analyze bulk contrast flow. The ground-truth 3D-CFD, reconstructed 3D-CBCT-DSA, and 2D-DSA projections were used to extract QAngio parameters related to contrast time dilution curves, such as area under the curve (AUC), peak height (PH), mean-transit-time (MTT), time-to-peak (TTP), and time to arrival (TTA). An initial comparison of quantitative flow parameters in both 2D and 3D, in a smaller and larger aneurysm, indicated that 3D-QAngio can provide a good description of bulk flow characteristics (TTA, TTP, MTT), but recovery of integral parameters (PH, AUC) aneurysms is limited. Nonetheless, incorporation of 3D-QAngio methods may provide additional insight into our understanding of abnormal vascular flow patterns.