294. LEARNING CURVE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: OUR SERIES, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy has demonstrated non-inferiority in terms of surgical and oncologic outcomes compared with open esophagectomy, with better short-term outcomes. The learning curve of this procedure is protracted before a plateau of ideal results is reached. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of implementing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy program for cancer in a high-volume center and the impact of the learning curve on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Methods This is a retrospective non-randomized control study. The study includes 199 patients who underwent surgery from June 2018 to October 2022. Patients undergoing MIE were assigned to the “MIE group” (n=61), while those undergoing Open Esophagectomy to the “OE group” (n=138). By comparing the perioperative and oncological outcomes between the two groups, we assessed the safety and efficacy of the MIE. Subsequently, the MIE group was divided into two subgroups: Early Experience (“EE”) and Late Experience (“LE”) group. By comparing the perioperative surgical outcomes between these two groups we evaluated the presence and the impact of a learning curve. Results Although longer surgical duration (p<0.001), MIE did not compromise surgical radicality (same rate of R0, p=0.345 and higher number of lymph node yields p<0.001). We observed a learning curve effect on postoperative outcomes, with decreasing complication rates (61% vs. 36.7%, p=0.054), and shorter ICU stay (1.6 ± 2.4 vs. 0.6 ± 1.5, p=0.049) and faster recovery in the LE group (19.6 ± 19.8 vs. 12.2 ± 5.9, p=0.055). Analysis of CUSUM plots reveals a decrease in total ICU and recovery starting with patient number 25. A meta-analysis confirms a trend towards lower anastomotic leak rates as the learning curve progresses. Conclusion The findings of this study support the safety and efficacy of implementing a totally MIE program for cancer in a high-volume center. The outcomes are not impaired by the learning curve effect and meet current standards. Comparing the outcomes of the early experience with those of the late experience, we discovered improving trends in postoperative complication and recovery rates. In our high-volume center's experience, improving these outcomes has required 25 to 30 cases.