Abstract

The response to aluminum (Al) application was compared between an Al-tolerant plant, ruzigrass (Brachiaria ruziziensis), and two cultivars of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Al-tolerant ‘Dayton’ and Al-sensitive ‘Kearney’, of Al at 1.0 mM level. The micro content of Al transportation and accumulation in leaf cell organelles (nuclei, mitochondria, and chloroplast) was determined by the 26Al tracer technique with accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), which could detect atoms of the order of 107 of 26Al. In a short-time-exposure experiment, plants were immersed into 0.1 mM 27Al (containing 101 dpm/300 mL 26Al) for 5 hours. Then the leaves were separated and 27Al and 26Al were determined. Growth of shoots and roots of ruzigrass was not influenced at 1 mM AlCl3, but the growth of barley cultivars (Dayton and Kearney) was seriously affected. There was only a small difference in Al content in shoot (about 5 g g−1) among plant species or cultivars when total leaf 27Al was determined by the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP/AES) method at 0.1 mM level. While large differences in the Al content between plant cultivars in the leaf subcellular organelles were found by using 26Al with the AMS method, the amount was in the order of 1–10 pg per 1 mg of organelle protein. Ruzigrass accumulated about 4 or 5 times higher content (2.8 ng mg−1 of protein) of 27Al in the nuclei and 2 or 3 times higher content (0.2 ng mg−1 of protein) in the mitochondria than the two barley cultivars did. There was no difference in Al accumulation in the chloroplast among these three plant cultivars.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call