(244) Participants with Penile Pain at Baseline May Benefit from Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Peyronie’s disease (PD) is traditionally categorized into 2 phases: acute (active) and chronic (stable) phase; however, clinical definitions and distinction between the phases vary in the literature and remain blurred.[1] The American Urological Association guidelines outline changing symptoms with the presence of pain as a defining symptom of acute disease, but provide little guidance about timeframe.[2] Historically, acute-phase characteristics include presence of penile pain and progressing deformity (eg, worsening penile curvature), with time from symptom onset to acute phase completion being <3–18 months.[1] While there may be academic utility in temporally categorizing PD, it may limit or postpone the treatment options for patients suffering from the condition. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is an approved nonsurgical PD treatment option and several studies suggest its safety and efficacy in acute phase PD.[3-6] In light of these studies and ambiguity in dichotomizing phases, previous clinical trial data were reanalyzed to investigate the potential for opening the gamut of treatment options at earlier timepoints in the disease process. Objective This analysis examines CCH treatment efficacy on improving penile curvature in participants presenting with/without penile pain at baseline and disease duration of 12–18 months or >18 months from the CCH clinical trial program. Methods Literature related to CCH treatment of acute phase PD was compiled and treatment outcomes assessed. Additionally, a post hoc analysis of pooled data from two phase 3 randomized, double-blind trials of CCH in PD (IMPRESS I, NCT01221597; IMPRESS II, NCT01221623) was conducted. CCH-treated participants were stratified by the reporting of moderate-severe pain or no pain at baseline based on the following study measures: penile pain on palpation, penile pain on erection, PD questionnaire (PDQ) combined questions 7–9, and PDQ question 10 only. Additional subgroup analyses stratified participants by presence of pain and disease duration (12–18 or >18 months). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in penile curvature at week 52 from baseline. Results The IMPRESS I/II data analysis found that participants who experienced moderate-severe pain at baseline had penile curvature improvements by week 52 similar to participants with no pain at baseline. Across all pain measures, the percentage decreases in mean penile curvature from baseline ranged from 29%–42% for moderate-severe pain groups and 35%–37% for no penile pain groups. There were no clear differences in mean penile curvature improvement between groups for any specific pain measure when stratified by disease duration of 12–18 months (moderate-severe pain, 32%–40% improvement; no pain, 23%–29% improvement) versus >18 months (moderate-severe pain, 24%–44% improvement; no pain, 37%–40% improvement). Outcomes from the IMPRESS trials were comparable in context with published literature. Conclusions Based on a subanalysis of IMPRESS data, there were no clear differences identified in CCH treatment outcomes between participants experiencing moderate-severe pain or no pain at baseline regardless of disease duration (12–18 versus >18 months). These analyses are consistent with other literature evaluating the efficacy of CCH in the acute phase of disease and suggest that ongoing pain is not a contraindication to CCH therapy. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc; Boston Scientific Corporation; Antares Pharma, Inc; PathRight Medical.