Abstract

The 210Po/210Pb disequilibrium was attempted to reveal the small-scale particle dynamics in the eastern tropical North Pacific. Seawater samples in the full water column were collected from three sites in the Tehuantepec bowl near the East Pacific Ridge for determination of dissolved and particulate 210Po and 210Pb. Our results show that TPo/TPb activity ratios in the full water column at the three sites are less than 1, with an average of 0.56, indicating that the total 210Po in the oligotrophic sea is significantly deficient. The activity ratios of DPo/DPb in the dissolved phase are less than 1, while those in the particulate phase are greater than 1 (except for the bottom 300 m), indicating fractionation between 210Po and 210Pb in the scavenging process. A negative linear relationship between 210Po deficit and silicate proves that biological activities are responsible for 210Po deficiency in the upper 200 m. However, the deficit of 210Po in the bottom 300 m may be caused by the horizontal transport of the hydrothermal plume. After correcting the horizontal contribution, the removal rates of 210Po for the 200–1,500 m and the bottom 300 m layers increased by 7.5–21 and 26.1–29.5%, respectively. Correspondingly, the variation range of the residence time of a total 210Po became smaller. Our calculations suggest that horizontal transport is acting as a stabilizer for small-scale variation in the 210Po deficit in the eastern tropical North Pacific. Our study highlights the need to pay more attention to the small-scale variation of 210Po deficit when applying 210Po/210Pb disequilibria to trace biogeochemical processes, and the mechanism responsible for this variation deserves further study.

Highlights

  • The 210Pb (T1/2 = 22.3 a) in seawater mainly comes from two sources, one is atmospheric deposition, and the other is in situ decay of 226Ra in seawater

  • The northwestward flow on the east side of the Costa Rica Dome (CRD) is known as the Costa Rica Coastal Current (CRCC), which continues along the coast into the Gulf of Tehuantepec, where it turns south to flow around the south side of the Tehuantepec bowl (TB)

  • The currents in the study area indicate that the subsurface water at site D may be affected by the upwelling of the CRD, while that at site F may be affected by the coastal water transported by the CRCC (Kessler, 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 210Pb (T1/2 = 22.3 a) in seawater mainly comes from two sources, one is atmospheric deposition, and the other is in situ decay of 226Ra in seawater. The radioactive decay of 222Rn in the atmosphere produces 210Pb, which is adsorbed by aerosols and sinks into the ocean. Atmospheric deposition is the main source of 210Pb in surface seawater. Unlike the upper water that is affected by atmospheric deposition, 210Pb in deep water is mainly produced by the in situ decay of 226Ra (Cochran, 1992). Atmospheric deposition contributes a little to 210Po in surface seawater, since the activity ratio of 210Po/210Pb in atmospheric aerosols is as low as about 0.1 (Burton and Stewart, 1960; Lambert and Nezami, 1965; Bacon et al, 1976), which is significantly lower than that in surface water (∼0.5, Shannon et al, 1970; Nozaki et al, 1976)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call