Abstract
Hydrogen NMR spin–lattice relaxation times were measured as a function of time to determine the kinetics of hydration for the Dave Johnston and Laramie River coal fly ashes and for the Lurgi spent oil shale. The kinetic data were compared to the hydration of Portland cement. It was found that the hydration kinetic data for the spent shale were similar to Portland cement with the exception that the dormant period was about 10 times longer. The dormant periods for the coal fly ashes differed from each other and from Portland cement. The Laramie River coal fly ash had almost no dormant period. The extent of hydration for the materials after 119 h can be ranked accordingly: Portland cement>Lurgi spent shale≃Laramie River coal fly ash>Dave Johnston coal fly ash. Data from this study show that an NMR spin–lattice relaxation time measurement may be a good predictor of the compressive strength of hydrated Portland cement and fly ash.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.